Sunday, August 4, 2013

SnappyCam Pro is the perfect app for sports, pets and kids pictures ...

Did you ever wish you could use your iPhone camera to take images at rapid-fire speeds and save the best ones? SnappyCam Pro does just that. The app is US$0.99 for a limited time.

The app's developers claim it will shoot up to 20 full-resolution pictures in one second when run on an iPhone 5. That's very fast. Rather than take time to save to your camera roll, the app presents a display of your images, and you can select the ones you want to save. GPS data is included, and all the other metadata the iPhone provides is tagged to each photo.

This is a great way to get decent sports, pet or kids photos. The app is working within the Apple SDK, so it doesn't break anything, but it fine-tunes and speeds up the taking of images to a degree that just hasn't been seen before.

I tried the app outside on some plants being blown in a light wind. Some were blurry, but some frames were caught in perfect focus. Shots of people walking or running produced similar results. The app gives you some choices about how it operates, so you can control the way the shutter interacts with your touch, and you can choose the aspect ratio of your images. You can adjust the camera field of view, and as you reduce resolution, the camera speeds up. At full resolution the app claims to do about 20 frames per second. I tried some photos in low light and was getting roughly 12 frames per second at full resolution. You can also turn geo-tagging off to get faster speed. Sound effects can also be switched off.

One criticism. Saving images is not intuitive. There are a couple of steps, and until I figured out the workflow, I didn't save everything I wanted. Better onscreen guides would help.

SnappyCam Pro is a rather extraordinary achievement in improving the flexibility of the iPhone camera. It's not going to get you perfect pictures with every frame, but it will give you the ability to pick and choose for a better chance at having a "keeper." There are some examples and more information on the developer website.

Reviews of the app are positive and well-deserved. It's one of the most innovative camera apps I've seen.

SnappyCam Pro supports iPad and iPhone from the 3GS and up. The newer your hardware, the faster the camera will run. The app requires iOS 4.2 or later, and the app is optimized for the iPhone 5.


Share

Source: http://www.tuaw.com/2013/08/02/snappycam-pro-is-the-perfect-app-for-sports-pets-and-kids-pictu/

encyclopedia britannica white lion mike d antoni resigns holes ncaa brackets 2012 odd lamar

Monday, July 22, 2013

American Legion District 3 baseball tournament starts tonight

American Legion District 3 baseball tournament starts tonight

11:41 a.m. EDT, July 22, 2013

JAMES CITY -- The American Legion District 3 tournament will begin Monday night as Hampton Post 31 hosts Poquoson Post 273 in the play-in game at E. Stan Trimble Field in Hampton at 7:30 p.m.

The play-in game was supposed to be held Sunday, but heavy rains throughout Hampton Roads forced the game to be moved until Monday.

The winner of that game will face top-seed Williamsburg Post 39 at 5:30 p.m. on Tuesday night as the tournament moves to a double-elimination format.? The Wildflowers finished the regular season undefeated against district competition.

Denbigh Post 368, the No.2 seed, will face No.3 seed Gloucester Post 75 in the second game slated for 8 p.m.

The two losing teams from Tuesday night will meet at 5:30 p.m. in the first elimination game on Wednesday. The two winning teams will square off at 8 p.m.

Thursday's contest will feature the winner from the elimination game against the loser from the winner's bracket at 7 p.m.

The district tournament champion will advance to next week's American Legion State tournament held at Warhill District Park.


Source: http://www.vagazette.com/va-vg-american-legion-district-3-baseball-tournament-starts-tonight-20130722,0,101833.story?track=rss

May the Fourth be with you James Righton finish line kentucky derby Iron Man 3 margaret thatcher MET GALA 2013

Wednesday, July 10, 2013

Energy Storage, Energy Efficiency, & Other Energy News

A bit more energy news for you, beyond the solar and wind pop stars:

  1. ?Intermittent and Unreliable? ? Another Nuclear Power Plant Fails In Extreme Heat
  2. 5 Ways To Engage Low-Income Customers On Energy Efficiency
  3. Energy Storage Promise Found In Common Chemical
  4. Biggest Oversight In Obama Climate Action Plan
  5. What Would Happen If Candidates & Electric Officials Were Asked To Sign A Climate Action Pledge?
  6. Energy Storage: Why We Need It & What It?s Worth
  7. Waste Wise Turns The Volume Up On Waste Management Solutions

For more, connect with me on Google+ or zacharyshahan.com.

Zachary Shahan (2411 Posts)

I'm the director of CleanTechnica, the most popular cleantech-focused website in the world, and Planetsave, a world-leading green and science news site. I've been covering green news of various sorts since 2008, and I've been especially focused on solar energy, electric vehicles, bicycling, and wind energy for the past few years. Aside from my work on CleanTechnica and Planetsave, I'm the Network Manager for their parent organization ? Important Media ? and I'm the Owner/Founder of Solar Love, EV Obsession, and Bikocity. To connect on some of your favorite social networks, go to ZacharyShahan.com or click on some of the links below.


Source: http://feeds.importantmedia.org/~r/IM-cleantechnica/~3/XqNFrQBqsU8/

lisa lampanelli bronx zoo bronx zoo crash grizzlies april 30 wwe extreme rules 2012 vontaze burfict

The ballad of the flexible budget

It's essential you allow yourself to be flexible with your budget, Hamm says. Recognizing that some portions of your budget (like mortgage payments) should be fixed while others (like food) change from month to month can save you from the stress of trying to stick to a rigid budget.

By Trent Hamm,?Guest blogger / July 9, 2013

Credit cards stick out of a wallet. It's important to set a budget that gives you the flexibility of spending more or less on certain items like food and energy according to your needs, Hamm says.

Stelios Varias/Reuters/File

Enlarge

There are a lot of different techniques for budgeting out there. There?s the standard ?write out a budget? method presented in a ton of personal finance books. There?s the ?envelope? method. There?s the electronic ?You Need a Budget? method.

Skip to next paragraph Trent Hamm

The Simple Dollar is a blog for those of us who need both cents and sense: people fighting debt and bad spending habits while building a financially secure future and still affording a latte or two. Our busy lives are crazy enough without having to compare five hundred mutual funds ? we just want simple ways to manage our finances and save a little money.

Recent posts

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; // google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

I?m not going to get into the ins and outs of each type of budget, except to say that they have a few big things in common.

The big one is that they all push you to compartmentalize your money into groups so that you can keep careful track of where your money is going.

They want you to allot a certain amount to your energy bill. They want you to allocate a certain amount to your monthly food spending. They want you to allocate a certain amount to your mortgage. You get the idea.

The idea behind this is that you should strive to set aside enough each month to ensure that each particular area of your life is covered. So, if you have a $1,200 mortgage payment each month, then $1,200 of your monthly income should be untouchable except for your mortgage payment. If you spend $800 on your family?s food each month, then $800 of your monthly income should be untouchable except for food.

Budgeting really does make a lot of sense. Except when it doesn?t.

See, while some of your budgetary items are extremely fixed ? like your mortgage payment ? others are not. Your food spending varies depending on whether you run out of staples, whether you have guests, and many other factors. Your energy spending varies depending upon the season. Your entertainment and hobby spending can vary a lot depending on your social calendar.

Most budgeting advice encourages you to assess this number based on your recent spending. They?ll tell you to take your food receipts for the last month, trim them by 10% or so, and use that as your food budget for the month. They?ll tell you to look at your last few energy bills, average them, and use that for your energy budget.

This doesn?t work.

You?re going to have a month where it?s freezing outside and you use a ton of energy. You?re going to have a month where family members invade like locusts and your food budget goes to the moon. You?re going to have a month where you end up making too many phone calls and your cell phone budget is too low.

You absolutely must have flexibility in your budget. A rigid budget doesn?t reflect real life.

I?ve been experimenting with budgets for our family recently, and I?ve found that my best solution to the flexible budget problem is really simple.

All I do is add a new line item to my budget called ?Flex.? That ?Flex? section is equal to 10% of the rest of my entire budget. So, if all of my other budget line items add up to $3,000, the ?flex? item is $300.

The entire purpose of that ?flex? section is to make sure that, if I go overboard on a particular budget area for a good reason, it?s not panic time. The ?flex? section will pick it up.

At the end of a month, if I still have money in the ?flex? section, I carry it forward to the next month. I also dump any extra money from other budget categories into ?flex? for the next month.

If ?flex? ever totals more than 25% of my budget, I use the extra for saving for a big long-term goal, like our next house. Alternately, you could use it for additional hobby or entertainment spending that month. So far, it?s gotten close to 25%, but it?s never quite made it.

On the other hand, ?flex? has made it a lot easier to stick to a strict budget. I know that if I go over a little bit on food spending one month, it?s not a panic situation. Instead, I know that ?flex? will cover it.

It?s vital to note, however, that any time you do go over in a category, you should spend some time reassessing that category. Should you be budgeting more there? Or was this a rare exception for a good reason that won?t regularly be repeated?

If you?re struggling with budgeting, adding ?flex? to your budget can make the whole process much easier. It might put a little squeeze on some of the more ?fun? areas of your budget, like hobby and entertainment spending, but your reward for that is a lot less stress and a lot more flexibility.

The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on www.thesimpledollar.com.

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/csm/~3/qnCxDEMSRCU/The-ballad-of-the-flexible-budget

Election results 2012 exit polls Presidential Polls California Propositions Electoral College chuck pagano A Gay Lesbian

Union bosses tell Ed Miliband: We'll block your new funding plan for Labout party

Ed Miliband today dismissed threats by trade union leaders to block his radical plan to reshape the relationship between Labour and its union founders.

The Labour leader said he was determined to force through "as soon as possible" a change under which union members would "opt in" to paying ?3 a year to the party rather than the present system under which they "opt out" if they do not wish to fund Labour.? ?I definitely want these changes agreed before the [2015] general election,? he said. ?No one should be in any doubt about my determination to get this done.?

Answering questions after a keynote speech in London, Mr Miliband hinted that Labour could turn down the unions? money unless their affiliation fees, which total ?8m annually, were collected in the way he proposes. He pointed out that unions decide whether to support the party financially ? and Labour decided whether to accept their money.

Asked if he would resign if he failed to secure his reforms, Mr Miliband said: ?We are going to get these changes.? I am absolutely determined.? These changes are necessary, they are the right thing to do. We are going to make them happen.?? He admitted the proposal would have ?massive financial implications? but insisted he would ?seize the moment?.

A review of the Labour-union link will he headed by Lord Collins, the party?s former general secretary, who is also a former official with Unite, the union which sparked the shake-up by alleged malpractice in trying to install its favoured candidate as Labour?s standard-bearer in Falkirk at the general election. The review will also look at the ?wider implications? of the proposed change, including the unions? 50 per cent share of the vote at Labour?s annual conference and 33 per cent share of the electoral college which chooses the party leader.

Mr Miliband denied the changes were weak, citing support for them from Tony Blair, who earlier praised the Labour leader for what he called ?a real act of leadership.? The former Prime Minister admitted that he should have introduced the same reforms when he was party leader, saying: ?I think this is a defining moment, and I think it's bold and it's strong.?? He added: "It's important not only in its own terms, because he's carrying through a process for reform in the Labour Party that's long overdue?.and I think this is also very important for the country - is that he's sending a very strong message to the country that in the end he'll do what's right for all the country and not simply for one section of it.?

But Billy Hayes, general secretary of the CWU postal workers? union, dismissed the proposal as ?a very old fashioned idea.? Asked whether he could stop Mr Miliband pushing it? through, he replied: "Well, let's see. Let's just see what happens in the process." He added: "We are going to make sure our voice is heard. We live in a democratic society and as I understand it we are entitled to have our say in the party."

Len McCluskey, the leader of Unite,? was more conciliatory, saying his union was ?more than happy? to engage in talks about the Miliband plan. ?He said: ?"It was certainly a bold and brave speech, and it may well be a historic one if Ed's vision comes to fruition.? He seemed to be saying that he wanted to see tens of thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands, of ordinary trade unionists actively playing an active role within the?Labour?Party. That's something I very much welcome.

However, before the speech, Mr McCluskey threatened to block the change. He said that it would ?require?Labour?to unite with the Tories to change the law, would debilitate the unions' ability to speak for their members and further undermine their status as voluntary, and self-governing, organisations.

Source: http://rss.feedsportal.com/c/266/f/3496/s/2e67a468/l/0L0Sindependent0O0Cnews0Cuk0Cpolitics0Cunion0Ebosses0Etell0Eed0Emiliband0Ewell0Eblock0Eyour0Enew0Efunding0Eplan0Efor0Elabout0Eparty0E86972720Bhtml/story01.htm

calvin johnson festivus festivus nfl playoff picture nfl playoff picture Peter Billingsley Larry King

Can't stop, won't stop: PRX introduces an app for unending audio ...

prxremixPRX is proposing a new model for what a radio station (or a ?radio? ?station?) can be with a new app that offers up pieces from shows you like, some from a few you may not recognize, and then puts the whole thing on shuffle.

PRX Remix is a curated, unending stream of radio stories, podcasts, interviews, and more material collected from programs like The Moth, WTF with Marc Maron, and Slate?s Gabfests among others. Remix has existed online and as an actual format for terrestrial and satellite radio for some time, but as of today, it?s also all jammed into an app for your iPhone or Android, following the broad shift toward mobile devices as where audio gets consumed.

What PRX Remix does is try to take advantage of the wealth of audio storytelling options the Internet has afforded, said PRX CEO Jake Shapiro. ?For the story hungry, there?s pretty much a bottomless appetite for really good stuff,? said Shapiro. But many of those stories don?t always fit perfectly into half-hour or hour-long slots on your local public radio station ??and on many stations, many of those those timeslots have been spoken for by the same set of shows for years or decades.

As a technology producer for public media, PRX has helped develop apps for programs like Radiolab and This American Life. As a distributor, they?ve put programs like The Moth and Snap Judgment in front of larger audiences. One reason it?s great time to be a fan of audio storytelling now is the variety, Shapiro said: Traditional players in public media continue to produce new stories and shows, while the Internet has opened up a universe of new independent players.

For a growing number of people, their audio diet is representative of that, with a mix of radio programs and podcasts, news and features. In that scenario, the biggest question becomes what to listen to next. PRX Remix is one answer to that. ?It?s a way to bring together what we?ve been learning in building mobile apps for media companies the last couple of years and apply it to something really close to our heart,? Shapiro said.

While the app is rich in stories, it?s short on features ? it?s mostly one big play button. Shapiro said that was a conscious choice in building the app. The main goal is to introduce people to new stories, give them ways to remember them, and share them with others. The app?s functionality allows users the ability to skip stories and also keep track of what they?ve listened to. One big benefit for the subway-riding crowd: The app will load up to an hour?s worth of audio for when you find yourself offline.

People on their phones represent a pretty desirable demographic to people in the audio business. As our phones continue to become our replacement for everything, audio works well on mobile is because the devices feel like a companion, Shapiro said. As our devices become more personalized and attuned to our habits, users want an experience that knows what they like but can also expose them to something new.

?The reality is there?s less and less patience for the mediocre or boring or pointless,? said Shapiro. ?Part of the value of the Remix app is we?ve done a lot of distilling ahead of time, but included in that are a lot of surprises.?

Serendipity can be a hard quality to replicate. PRX producer Roman Mars oversees remix and selects which stories are fed into the remix app. (You may know him better as the host of the wonderful 99% Invisible, a podcast/radio show about design.) While the pieces are selected by a human, the order and sorting is done at random. Each week, PRX adds more to the mix. Shapiro said future versions of the app could incorporate an algorithm that learns from users? listening habits.

This is not the first attempt to make a Pandora for public media. In 2011, as an experiment, NPR showed off the first iteration of its Infinite Player, a customizable web app that lets listeners create an endless stream of radio content ? although, unlike Remix, its audio is mostly drawn from flagship NPR shows. This spring, NPR began beta testing a mobile-friendly version of the app for iPhone users.

The most significant difference between Remix and the Infinite Player is the audio sources they draw on. Infinite Player, as an NPR project, draws primarily on NPR?s flagship shows; in a runthrough this morning, its first 10 pieces came from Morning Edition (6), Weekend Edition Saturday (1), and NPR?s top-of-the-hour newscasts (3).

The first 10 pieces to show up in a similar runthrough of Remix came from a very different mix of sources: The Memory Palace (a short reflection on the Ben Franklin Death Ray!), The Kitchen Sisters (on the birth of the Frito), Sound Portraits? The Ground We Lived On (about the journalist Adrian Nicole LeBlanc), a 99% Invisible piece on San Francisco concrete, a piece called Talk to Me About Love on a sibling relationship, a piece from Radio Diaries, one from Snap Judgment, a short documentary piece from the Third Coast International Audio Festival, something called Beep Beep, and a discussion of Fiona Apple?s last album from Sound Opinions. A very different mix.

While PRX Remix is a clear bet on mobile devices, Shapiro said its important to not lose sight of the fact that terrestrial radio still commands a large audience. Even as PRX debuts the app, Remix continues to expand into new public radio stations.

As technology reshapes how radio and audio content is delivered, it?s also changing formats for storytelling, Shaprio said. Something like PRX Remix embraces the value of narrative, feature pieces, and other stories that can wind up ?on the margins of the news format,? Shapiro said. ?What Remix is establishing is a new format: It?s the story-driven audio journalism format,? he said.

Source: http://www.niemanlab.org/2013/07/cant-stop-wont-stop-prx-introduces-an-app-for-unending-audio-storytelling/

masters leaderboard Psy Gentleman Angel Cabrera Jay Z Open Letter glee glee masters live

The life of the child bride bin Laden's courier

Maryam was just 14 when her father arranged for her to marry Ibrahim Saeed Ahmed, the man who would become the al Qaeda courier of Zero Dark Thirty fame and unwittingly lead the Americans to Osama bin Laden.

?At the time, she had no idea her husband, Ibrahim, was a mujahid,? says the final report of a Pakistani commission that found her to be its most informative witness in its investigation into the 2011 raid at Abbottabad.

She was only 15 when a car she was in was pulled over by a Pakistani cop who apparently did not imagine any more than she did that the tall, clean-shaven man riding with her and her husband was bin Laden.

She was no more than 16 when she saw a TV news item about the 2003 arrest of Khalid Sheikh Muhammad and realized he and his family had just been her houseguests for two weeks.

She still did not know the identity of the tall, clean-shaven man until she finally confronted her husband after a decade of deception and demanded to know the full truth about him and his friends.

That was shortly before the fateful raid, in which her husband was killed along with bin Laden. Maryam was shot in the face, but she survived, now 24 and with four children. She had been in the custody of the Pakistani intelligence for five months when she was questioned by the commission.

Her account, which a commission report leaked this week to Al Jazeera?terms ?generally credible,? began with her arranged marriage in 2001 to the son of a longtime friend of her father. The couple traveled from their native Shangla district to Karachi, where they enjoyed a Walima dinner, or wedding banquet, at the home of a woman whom Maryam only knew as a native of Baluchistan province.

Not long afterward came the world-shaking news of the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Maryam would tell investigators that her husband was often traveling during this period, saying he had business in Kuwait. She went back to Shangla for a brief time and then returned to Karachi, where she was joined by Ibrahim. He introduced her to a young woman named Amal, who had a baby daughter.

Ibrahim told Maryam that Amal was the wife of a friend and was having ?some problems with her passport.? He explained that they would all be flying from Karachi to Peshawar, where he hoped to rectify the passport troubles. They then traveled to Swat, where they were joined by three men, one a driver, another clad in a police uniform, and a third ?a clean-shaven Arab.?

?All she noticed was that the clean-shaven man was very tall,? the commission reports.

In Swat, they all settled into what she would describe as a beautiful house with a river running behind it and beyond that a road eventually leading to her childhood home. The others remained so reserved and close-mouthed that Maryam was greatly surprised when Amal became pregnant after they had been in Swat for six months.

?Only then did Maryam realize that Amal was the wife of the tall clean-shaven Arab,? the commission says. ?Her husband had discouraged her from being inquisitive.?

The report adds, ?Maryam of course had no occasion to speak to the tall Arab.?

A small town with a bazaar was about a half hour away, and they were all heading there when a policeman stopped them for speeding. The clean-shaven man sat silent as Maryam?s husband hopped out.

?Her husband very quickly sorted out the matter with the policeman and they drove on,? the commission?s report says.

The group in the house came to include Ibrahim?s brother, Abrar, who married a woman named Bushra. There were no other visitors save for a man who came for a fortnight with his wife and seven children. Maryam was introduced to him as ?Hafeez.? She recognized the wife as the woman who had hosted her wedding banquet in Karachi.

A month after ?Hafeez? and his family departed, Maryam saw his face in an Al Jazeera news report about the arrest in Karachi of the alleged mastermind of the 9/11 attacks.

?She asked her husband about him and he told her he was a great mujahid whose name was actually Khalid Sheikh Muhammed,? the commission reports. ?Ibrahim was extremely upset about his arrest.?

Three days later, Ibrahim and the tall Arab left Swat. Ibrahim returned after two days and hired a bus. He drove Maryam, his brother, and Bushra, along with Amal and the children, to Peshawar.

?[Maryam] began to realize that her husband was a mujahid of al Qaeda, though apparently she did not guess the identity of the husband of Amal,? the report says. ?She tried to probe Ibrahim, but he firmly told her not to press him for details and not to be too curious.?

From there, they went to Haripur, where they were joined by the tall Arab, along with a number of other women and a young man. The group resided there for two years in a large house.

?Amal twice gave birth,? the report notes.

On both occasions, Abrar and Bushra took Amal to a private clinic as an outpatient. The obstetrician, a woman, was told that Amal was deaf and mute.

There were no visitors. Ibrahim and Abrar seldom spent a night away from the tall Arab. The men ate together, sharing the same food, and whiled away their time watching TV, mainly Al Jazeera, via a satellite dish. They abstained from using their cellphones. One of the two brothers would travel as far as Peshawar or even Rawalpindi to use a pay phone.

In 2005, they all moved to Abbottabad and settled into a walled compound for the next six years. The tall Arab and Amal, along with several other women and a young man, took the upper floors of the main house. Abrar and Bushra took the first floor. Maryam and Ibrahim occupied an annex building along with their four children, the oldest of whom in early 2011 was 9-year-old Rahma.

?One day, [Rahma] asked her father why ?the uncle who lives upstairs? in the main house never went to the bazaar,? the report says. ?Ibrahim invented a story that he was too poor to go out and buy anything.?

From then on, Rahma referred to the man as ?Miskin Kaka,? or ?Poor Uncle.? She was visiting the main house for school lessons taught by one of the women when she happened to encounter the tall man in a staircase. She and her siblings and their mother were immediately banned from the main house. They had no further interaction with the residents of the upper floors. Ibrahim homeschooled the couple?s kids.

Females were initially allowed to watch TV as long as even those as young as 3 covered their faces whenever a male appeared on screen. The fateful raid was five months away on the day a dutifully veiled Rahma saw someone familiar on Al Jazeera.

?A picture of Osama bin Laden came on the screen and Rahma immediately recognized him as her Miskin Kaka, who lived upstairs in the main house,? the report says. ?Ibrahim in a state of panic stopped his family from watching TV.?

His wife had reached a limit.

?Maryam demanded an explanation as well as the real identity of the so-called Miskin Kaka who was always referred to as the Sheikh,? the report says. ?He told her it was none of her business but she complained he did not trust her and stopped talking to him.?

The dynamics of the mujahid marriage proved not so different from that of many others.

?Ibrahim at last confessed to Maryam that their daughter was right,? the report continues. ?Miskin Kaka was none other than Osama bin Laden.?

Lest anyone feel unduly sorry for Maryam, she apparently did not express any shock or revulsion that her husband had been involved in the murder of thousands of innocents in defiance of all responsible Muslim teaching.

?Maryam asked Ibrahim how had he taken upon himself such a large responsibility to serve and protect such a wanted man,? the report says. ?Ibrahim said it was the will of Allah that he should have this mission.?

She told him she was not frightened at the prospect of him becoming a martyr.

?But she did fear his arrest and torture,? the report goes on. ?She would rather he was martyred than captured.?

Ibrahim seems to have sought to placate her.

?Ibrahim apparently said he would be soon be relieved of his current responsibilities and get some property in Saudi Arabia or elsewhere to compensate him for his services,? the report says.

Prior to the ban from the main house, Maryam and her children had been allowed to visit the women there once a month for 10 or 15 minutes. She now came to understand that the two older women where with Amal were bin Laden?s older wives. The two younger women were his daughters. There were also two of his sons, one an adult, the other a toddler.

Maryam further learned that her husband had practically grown up with Khalid Sheikh Muhammad in Kuwait and that the two were as close as brothers. That explained how her wedding dinner came to be in the home of the self-described mastermind of 9/11.

What Maryam did not know was that the CIA was zeroing in on her husband as bin Laden?s link to the outside world. The agents at first only identified him by his jihad name, Ibrahim al-Kuwaiti. They now learned that his real name was Ibrahim Saeed Ahmed and managed to pinpoint him as he made one of his payphone calls. They then tracked him to the compound.

The CIA still wanted to confirm bin Laden was there before risking a strike so deep inside Pakistan and so near its military academy. Bin Laden did not make it easier by never venturing beyond a small walled-in area adjacent to the main house and even then wearing a cowboy hat to thwart overhead surveillance.

In April, Maryam visited Shangla for 17 days, telling her family that she had been in Kuwait and supporting the fiction by bringing gifts she said were from there. She returned to Abbottabad on April 28.

On May 1, Maryam went to bed at 10 p.m. She was awakened around midnight by what the report describes as ?a noise of a magnitude she had never heard before.?

The eldest child, Rahma, was terrified and Ibrahim went to calm her and the other children. The cellphone he never used rang. He answered and asked if it was his brother calling, but he got no response.

?Abrar, I cannot hear you, I am coming,? he said, by his wife?s account.

At that moment, a knock came at the door.

?Abrar, is that you?? Ibrahim asked.

Ibrahim was opening the door when he was shot with a silencer-equipped weapon. He fell mortally wounded, his feet happening to close the door he had just opened.

Maryam felt a bullet graze her cheek and teeth. She was also hit in the right shoulder and went down. One of the younger children ran up to her.

?Mother, don?t die. If you die, what shall we do?? the child reportedly said.

A voice commanded her in Arabic to open the door.

?You have killed my husband and now only my children and I are in the room,? she responded, by her account.

The order came again, in Arabic and Urdu, along with a warning that otherwise access would be achieved with explosives. Maryam dragged herself over and complied.

The Navy SEALS entered and searched her, in her version slapping her when she resisted. She says that she cursed them, telling them in Arabic, ?God is great against you.?

Maryam was ordered to sit outside with her children. The surviving women in the main house would tell the commission of bin Laden?s last moments, saying he was reaching for his weapon. Maryam?s brother-in-law, Abrar, and sister-in-law, Bushra, also were killed along with bin Laden?s older son Khalid. None of the dozen children were hurt, and the SEALs made sure to move them to a far corner of the compound before destroying their crashed helicopter with a blast whose concussion shattered the buildings? windows.

The surviving helicopter carried away the SEALs along with bin Laden?s body, computer hard drives, and a purse containing his will. His oldest wife, Khairiyyah, would say she had read it but would refuse to divulge its contents.

?Other reports suggested that the will said his children should not seek the leadership of al Qaeda,? the commission says.

Pakistani police and military arrived. An ambulance came to take Maryam to a hospital. She first went back into the annex where Ibrahim lay dead. She kissed the forehead of the man she had married a decade before, when she was just 14.

What she could not have known but she should now consider and we should all remember is that the same SEALS who killed her husband saved her children, along with the other kids who were there. That includes the 3-year-old, Hussein, who had been sleeping in bin Laden?s room. The boy is the son of the youngest wife. It was her turn that night to be with his father.

The CIA, including the agent who is made a hero in Zero Dark Thirty, wanted to just ?push the easy button? and bomb the compound, even though that would have meant killing the kids who were clearly visible in the drone surveillance video.

The SEALs prevailed and at great risk to themselves saved us from also killing a bunch of youngsters when we finally brought justice to bin Laden.

We now learn from Maryam?s account that he should have been caught years before in the way of so many other common criminals, in a routine traffic stop.

Related from The Daily Beast

Like us on Facebook - Follow us on Twitter - Sign up for The Cheat Sheet Newsletter

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/al-qaeda-child-bride-084500104.html

Breaking Amish Indianapolis explosion mike brown bcs rankings jay cutler applebees jeff gordon